From: Kalb, Dan
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2014 8:21 PM
To: John E Klein
Subject: RE: Domain Awareness Center - Jan. 21
I dont have any more information at this time, other than Councilmember Schaaf me
t with the ACLU 
attorney earlier today. One of my staff attending this meeting (I was unable to 
attend), but I have not 
yet been briefed on what transpired at this meeting. 
I had already asked the Administration to provide an update on the drafting proc
ess of the privacy & 
data retention policy at the Public Safety committee meeting on the 28th. 
Best,
-Dan
From: John E Klein [mailto:mandala051@gmail.com]  
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 8:18 PM 
To: Kalb, Dan 
Subject: Re: Domain Awareness Center - Jan. 21
Hi Dan. As additional information on the drafting of the privacy policy, I've he
ard from 
reasonably reliable sources that both the ACLU and EFF are NOT involved with the
 drafting 
and they only provided feedback (negative) at the outset in July-ish.  They aren
't involved 
because they don't want to legitimize the DAC or help draft policies that will u
ltimately fail.  
That's the scoop I have.
The email seems to indicate otherwise in that it shows more recent contacts with
 EFF and the 
ACLU. Granted the email is nothing more than an invitation to a meeting and does
n't indicate 
what the responses were from ACLU/EFF, if any.
Further, my sources say that only OPD and the City Attorney are drafting the pri
vacy policy 
which is pretty bad news.
Again, it seems like the 28th at the Public Safety meeting would be a good time 
for an update 
with some accurate information. 
John
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:36 PM, John E Klein <mandala051@gmail.com> wrote:
Dan. 
Attached is a Nov. 2013 email about the Working Group for the DAC privacy policy
. It's from a 
public records request. It would be helpful to know more precisely which organiz
ations are 
attending the group meetings and which are actually helping with the draft.  Joh
n